Subscribe to OliviaMunn.com

OliviaMunn.com » ALL THINGS OLIVIA » Random Pet Peeve

1. 

   seth_david_andrew
   Member

   @Gerrad I think my standards are misplaced, maybe?? I was more interested in seeing something with novelty value, instead of seeing a box of cow tongues in the form of a downstairs mixup.

   http://twitter.com/SDAH

   Posted 4 months ago #
2. 

   dev_squid
   Member

   Alrighty. Listen here, folks.

   I've made my peace with the fact that I will never get to experience the wholesome goodness that is Olivia Munn in the buff. In all honesty, though, look at all of the other women who went from 'Innocent Actress' to 'Camera Whore'. It would be hard to take her seriously any more; All I'd see when watching AOTS is a (beautfully exotic, drop-dead gorgeous, steamy look-but-don't-touch) nude Olivia. I don't think it would help her career much, despite popular belief.

   Now, I did find it odd that she even shot with Playboy considering her reluctance to strip off the cloth, so to speak; after all, Playboy is...Playboy. It was rather disappointing to find that there's nothing to find. All of this aside, however, I appreciate Olivia as a beautiful woman, regardless of her fame and glory. On the other hand, I respect her (platonic) status as the funny, entertaining, and highly-intoxicating co-host known fondly as Olivia.

   To put it frankly, this 'tease' that she put on is just as much of a turn-on as any nude photo--well, not quite, but you know what I mean. It leaves a lot to the imagination, something that I normally find eye-gougingly kitten-punchingly frustrating, but this is different.

   Olivia, I love you.
   - dev_squid

   On day, I was lying in bed, looking at the stars; and then I wondered, "...where did my ceiling go?"

   Posted 3 weeks ago #
3. 

   Loi
   Member

   @dev_squid

   I concur

   Besides, she has the Maxim and Hey Olivia! photo shoots for you to look at the more daring and risqué pictures of her there if you need them. Playboy was more of a warm-up photo shoot for her. It also gave her a bigger audience (yes, I do realize that has a hidden sexual reference but idc, hidden sexual references give life a zest of flavor that is both subtle yet enjoyable, if you have the sort of twisted mind such as I do to enjoy this comment) to connect to because the G4 age range doesn't have as high of a peak (yes, another hidden sexual reference) as the Playboy age range does. If you even read why she didn't have a nude photo shoot, you would agree it was the right choice for her not to.

   But I can't concur with you on one thing...why would you even talk about punching a kitten? Cats can be beaten up by why do the cute kittens have to be beaten up too?

   My Signature

   Posted 3 weeks ago #
4. 

   phil4real
   Member

   Wow my douche meter is ringing off the hook

   Posted 3 weeks ago #
5. 

   Gerrad
   Member

   This was still a concern?

   Hugs and Kisses to All of Your Pink Parts.
   http://soundsoflightandfury.blogspot.com/ or http://twitter.com/_Gerrad

   Posted 3 weeks ago #
6. 

   Loi
   Member

   Apparently it was...which I don't get

   Posted 3 weeks ago #
7. 

   Gerrad
   Member

   I retract my earlier comment, I don't think more boobs will ever not be an issue

   Posted 3 weeks ago #
8. 

   briscojr
   Member

   Bump a thread with at least some god damn reason please.

   I am obsolete. This must be what old people feel like. And Blockbuster.
   - Dollhouse (R.I.P.)

   Posted 3 weeks ago #
9. 

   dev_squid
   Member

   Oh, shit. Last post before mine was three months ago. Sorry for the necro-bump. Do I need a reason other than "Well, there was this 'Reply' box that seemed attractive..."?

   Posted 3 weeks ago #
10. 

    oshiomogho
    Member

    Why do we have a thread about Heidi Montag?... I didnt think anyone cared about her

    http://twitter.com/oshiomogho
    OMunn Gallery in Progress

    Posted 3 weeks ago #
11. 

    Gerrad
    Member

    Spencer Prattt has a words to say about that

    Posted 3 weeks ago #

RSS feed for this topic