Subscribe to OliviaMunn.com

E-MAIL
by pressing send you agree to our privacy policy
Log In

OliviaMunn.com » ALL THINGS OLIVIA » Random Pet Peeve

Non-Nude Playboy Cover Girls - 41 posts

  • Started 4 months ago by Bill-Bacon-Boots
  • Latest reply from Gerrad

Tags:

No tags yet.

  1. Bill-Bacon-Boots
    Member

    misleading and contradicting, that's like trying to get drunk off of non-alcoholic beer, there's no point. if she doesn't want to show off her heavenly body, then fine. but don't be on the cover of a nude magazine.clearly, she just did it for the money or as an ego booster. thats my pet peeve

    Posted 4 months ago #
  2. GoodEats
    Member

    I bet she regrets in now...

    RIP ODB
    Posted 4 months ago #
  3. briscojr
    Member

    Clearly they were after her though, and I think they'd asked her to be in the magazine many, many times. It wasn't like she was the one begging them to be in it. I guess when they finally agreed she could do it non-nude, what is she supposed to say, no? Of course it's good publicity for her and her career (not buying the ego boost, I don't think she's that shallow) and I'm sure the money was good too. In the profession she's chosen, the cover of any magazine is a big deal, and I don't think too many actresses would turn down the cover of Playboy.

    If you think that appearing on the cover of Playboy means you have to be nude inside, then be mad at Heff, or whoever is running Playboy these days. Also, did you have the same reaction when Seth Rogen and Steve Martin were on the cover? And be prepared for more disappointment over the Marge Simpson cover... I don't think we're going to find out if she's a natural bluehead or not.

    I am obsolete. This must be what old people feel like. And Blockbuster.
    - Dollhouse (R.I.P.)
    Posted 4 months ago #
  4. daniel
    Member

    What he said ^ only I would add You douche! to it.

    Why are you reading this? I have nothing to say to you.
    Posted 4 months ago #
  5. johndp
    Member

    hahaa yeah Olivia Munn does what she wants!
    lol

    MUNNy MUNNy MUNNy MUNNy MUUUNNAY!
    Posted 4 months ago #
  6. Bill-Bacon-Boots
    Member

    ha good point , i dont mean to be a douche , im just mad inside

    Posted 4 months ago #
  7. briscojr
    Member

    @B-B-B I could totally see your point if I bought that thinking she was going to be nude inside, but she went out of her way to point out it was non-nude. In every interview, even the radio one she did last week, she always makes it very clear that its a non-nude shoot. Obviously Playboy aren't going to put a sticker across the front cover saying that, but I think most of us knew what we'd be getting when we bought the issue.

    Now the fact there's only ONE picture inside is a totally different matter....!

    I will officially on Playboy for that one.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  8. daniel
    Member

    What he said ^ again only I would add "We're cool man".

    Posted 4 months ago #
  9. briscojr
    Member

    I'm only doing all your typing for you because it's your birthday. After today you're on your own again!

    Posted 4 months ago #
  10. Gerrad
    Member

    Wait there are supposed to be nude pictures in Playboy?! I wouldn't know, I only read it for the articles.

    Hugs and Kisses to All of Your Pink Parts.
    http://soundsoflightandfury.blogspot.com/ or http://twitter.com/_Gerrad
    Posted 4 months ago #
  11. Terrence Cheek
    Member

    Its a tradition the more awesome you are you can do the cover with out being nude, its a promotion for the persons article or movie. Though I was mad when I got my uncles Dolly Parton cover and those two big beautiful pillows of love was covered lol it was a fail for me

    Posted 4 months ago #
  12. FuRyUs
    Member

    The God with Horns! Worship him, bitches!!!
    lol
    Posted 4 months ago #
  13. acarani
    Member

    At least she did not have hairy arm pits like Madonna.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  14. Bill-Bacon-Boots
    Member

    olivia has some sexy armpits thats for sure,

    Posted 4 months ago #
  15. Btab
    Member

    Why would you be mad? It's illogical. Why would you be confused by the fact that she has clothes on on the cover? It doesn't mean everyone will have clothes on inside.

    Ohh, good for you.
    And how was it?
    || To the Batcave! ||
    Posted 4 months ago #
  16. therick
    Member

    To be able to be on the cover of that mag and not have to be nude...thats power baby...

    all the crybabies can check out the multitude of free porn on the web

    Posted 4 months ago #
  17. Jhylla81
    Member

    He actually has a career. She doesn't necessarily have to get nude. Unlike Stacey Dash...

    "No, it's not evil spirits. It's just rain. Rrraaiiinnn. Fine! Try and kill it!...Children!"
    Posted 4 months ago #
  18. tbryantx
    Member

    Why would anyone complain about Olivia pictures? Clothes or not, her personality shines in every shot. Now, if you are dying for attention and are named Heidi Montag, you have no business selling yourself on a Playboy cover unless you are sharing your only interesting assets.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  19. Master Gio
    Member

    Playboy is lame, that's basically the reason behind this all. they are desperate for you to buy their mag, even so much so that they'll have Maxim style photo shoots inside.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  20. Dave-O
    Member

    Fact- Stacey Dash is hot

    Any of you homos touch my stuff... I'll kill ya.
    Posted 4 months ago #
  21. Gerrad
    Member

    @Dave-O As if. She's a total Monet.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  22. Bill-Bacon-Boots
    Member

    i feel like a dick for posting this, sorry olivia

    Posted 4 months ago #
  23. Jack
    Member

    @BBB I would have expected that from Bill-Sausage-Boots, not you.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  24. TrojanMayhem (Minja)
    Member

    @Jack

    http://twitter.com/trojanmayhem
    Come manifest yourself in front of me, that I may pee on you......
    Posted 4 months ago #
  25. SniperMonk
    Member

    Guess a curtain someone doesn't read up on the photoshoot with Olivia posing for playboy :P. She said she didn't do full nude cause full nude is reserved for people who need a jump start in their career. So a non-nude playboy isn't all that bad Olivia still made my jaw drop. And if you stop to think about it that's the closest any of us will see Olivia completely naked. So be thankful you saw her in a very, very sexy way.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  26. uɐʎɹ
    Member

    I was more upset when I found out Steve Martin wouldn't be nude when I bought that issue.

    And absolutely furious with the Seinfeld issue!

    I have opinions of my own -- strong opinions -- but I don't always agree with them.
    twitter.com/upsidedownryan
    Posted 4 months ago #
  27. seth_david_andrew
    Member

    Guess a curtain someone.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  28. briscojr
    Member

    @sda Beef curtains of course. (Gerrad is already going to want his click back)

    Posted 4 months ago #
  29. seth_david_andrew
    Member

    I hovered over that link for like a full minute before I took the plunge.

    I was not disappointed.

    Posted 4 months ago #
  30. Gerrad
    Member

    @brisco Fuck. I'd have even settled for some meat skirt

    @SDAYour standards are too low... There was an implied promise there. IMPLIED I SAY!!

    Posted 4 months ago #

Reply »

You must log in to post.